2009 Chevrolet Impala vs. 1982 Opel Ascona
To start off, 2009 Chevrolet Impala is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Opel Ascona. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Opel Ascona would be higher. At 3,900 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Chevrolet Impala is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Chevrolet Impala (234 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 119 more horse power than 1982 Opel Ascona. (115 HP @ 5800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet Impala should accelerate faster than 1982 Opel Ascona.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Chevrolet Impala (325 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 175 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Opel Ascona. (150 Nm @ 4800 RPM). This means 2009 Chevrolet Impala will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Opel Ascona.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Chevrolet Impala | 1982 Opel Ascona | |
Make | Chevrolet | Opel |
Model | Impala | Ascona |
Year Released | 2009 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3900 cc | 1796 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 234 HP | 115 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Torque | 325 Nm | 150 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5100 mm | 4370 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2810 mm | 2600 mm |