2009 Chevrolet Impala vs. 1990 Ford Aerostar

To start off, 2009 Chevrolet Impala is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 Ford Aerostar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 Ford Aerostar would be higher. At 3,973 cc (6 cylinders), 1990 Ford Aerostar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Chevrolet Impala (234 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 80 more horse power than 1990 Ford Aerostar. (154 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet Impala should accelerate faster than 1990 Ford Aerostar.

Because 1990 Ford Aerostar is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1990 Ford Aerostar. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet Impala, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Chevrolet Impala (325 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 27 more torque (in Nm) than 1990 Ford Aerostar. (298 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2009 Chevrolet Impala will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1990 Ford Aerostar.

Compare all specifications:

2009 Chevrolet Impala 1990 Ford Aerostar
Make Chevrolet Ford
Model Impala Aerostar
Year Released 2009 1990
Body Type Sedan Minivan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3900 cc 3973 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type V V
Horse Power 234 HP 154 HP
Engine RPM 5600 RPM 4000 RPM
Torque 325 Nm 298 Nm
Torque RPM 4000 RPM 2400 RPM
Drive Type Front Rear
Number of Doors 4 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Length 5100 mm 4450 mm
Vehicle Width 1860 mm 1830 mm
Vehicle Height 1500 mm 1860 mm
Wheelbase Size 2810 mm 3030 mm