2009 Chevrolet Impala vs. 1990 TVR Type S
To start off, 2009 Chevrolet Impala is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 TVR Type S. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 TVR Type S would be higher. At 3,900 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Chevrolet Impala is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Chevrolet Impala (234 HP) has 34 more horse power than 1990 TVR Type S. (200 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet Impala should accelerate faster than 1990 TVR Type S.
Because 1990 TVR Type S is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1990 TVR Type S. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet Impala, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2009 Chevrolet Impala has automatic transmission and 1990 TVR Type S has manual transmission. 1990 TVR Type S will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Chevrolet Impala will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Chevrolet Impala | 1990 TVR Type S | |
| Make | Chevrolet | TVR |
| Model | Impala | Type S |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1990 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3900 cc | 2931 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 234 HP | 200 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 5100 mm | 3970 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1130 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2810 mm | 2300 mm |
