2009 Chevrolet Impala vs. 1996 Holden XU 6
To start off, 2009 Chevrolet Impala is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Holden XU 6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Holden XU 6 would be higher.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Holden XU 6 (515 Nm) has 224 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Chevrolet Impala. (291 Nm). This means 1996 Holden XU 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Chevrolet Impala.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Chevrolet Impala | 1996 Holden XU 6 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Holden |
Model | Impala | XU 6 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 211 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 291 Nm | 515 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |