2009 Chevrolet Impala vs. 2004 Ford E-350
To start off, 2009 Chevrolet Impala is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Ford E-350. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Ford E-350 would be higher. At 5,408 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford E-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford E-350 (255 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 44 more horse power than 2009 Chevrolet Impala. (211 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford E-350 should accelerate faster than 2009 Chevrolet Impala. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford E-350 weights approximately 939 kg more than 2009 Chevrolet Impala. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford E-350 (475 Nm) has 185 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Chevrolet Impala. (290 Nm). This means 2004 Ford E-350 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Chevrolet Impala.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Chevrolet Impala | 2004 Ford E-350 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Ford |
Model | Impala | E-350 |
Year Released | 2009 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3500 cc | 5408 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 211 HP | 255 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 290 Nm | 475 Nm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1549 kg | 2488 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5100 mm | 5900 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 2140 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2810 mm | 3510 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 132 L |