2009 Chevrolet Impala vs. 2004 Marcos TS
To start off, 2009 Chevrolet Impala is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Marcos TS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Marcos TS would be higher. At 5,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Marcos TS is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Marcos TS weights approximately 200 kg more than 2009 Chevrolet Impala.
Because 2004 Marcos TS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Marcos TS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet Impala, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Chevrolet Impala | 2004 Marcos TS | |
Make | Chevrolet | Marcos |
Model | Impala | TS |
Year Released | 2009 | 2004 |
Engine Size | 3500 cc | 5000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 211 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1075 kg | 1275 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5100 mm | 4010 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1160 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2810 mm | 2230 mm |