2009 Chevrolet Impala vs. 2006 Kia Optima

To start off, 2009 Chevrolet Impala is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Kia Optima. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Kia Optima would be higher. At 3,900 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Chevrolet Impala is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Chevrolet Impala (234 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 64 more horse power than 2006 Kia Optima. (170 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet Impala should accelerate faster than 2006 Kia Optima.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Chevrolet Impala (325 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 80 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Kia Optima. (245 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2009 Chevrolet Impala will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Kia Optima.

Compare all specifications:

2009 Chevrolet Impala 2006 Kia Optima
Make Chevrolet Kia
Model Impala Optima
Year Released 2009 2006
Body Type Sedan Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3900 cc 2671 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type V V
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 234 HP 170 HP
Engine RPM 5600 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 325 Nm 245 Nm
Torque RPM 4000 RPM 4000 RPM
Drive Type Front Front
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Length 5100 mm 4730 mm
Vehicle Width 1860 mm 1820 mm
Vehicle Height 1500 mm 1420 mm
Wheelbase Size 2810 mm 2710 mm
Fuel Consumption 8.7 L/100km 8.7 L/100km
Fuel Consumption City 13.8 L/100km 11.8 L/100km
Fuel Consumption Overall 11.2 L/100km 10.2 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 64 L 65 L