2009 Chevrolet Impala vs. 2012 Lexus RX
To start off, 2012 Lexus RX is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 Chevrolet Impala. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 Chevrolet Impala would be higher. Both 2009 Chevrolet Impala and 2012 Lexus RX are equipped with a 3,500 cc engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Lexus RX (295 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 84 more horse power than 2009 Chevrolet Impala. (211 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Lexus RX should accelerate faster than 2009 Chevrolet Impala. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Lexus RX weights approximately 975 kg more than 2009 Chevrolet Impala. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Chevrolet Impala | 2012 Lexus RX | |
Make | Chevrolet | Lexus |
Model | Impala | RX |
Year Released | 2009 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3500 cc | 3500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 211 HP | 295 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | CVT |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1075 kg | 2050 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5100 mm | 4770 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1885 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1684 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2810 mm | 2741 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 8.1 L/100km | 8.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 12.4 L/100km | 7.4 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 65 L |