2009 Chevrolet Lumina vs. 2005 Volvo XC90
To start off, 2009 Chevrolet Lumina is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Volvo XC90. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Volvo XC90 would be higher. At 5,967 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Chevrolet Lumina is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Chevrolet Lumina (362 HP) has 94 more horse power than 2005 Volvo XC90. (268 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet Lumina should accelerate faster than 2005 Volvo XC90. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Volvo XC90 weights approximately 177 kg more than 2009 Chevrolet Lumina.
Because 2005 Volvo XC90 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Chevrolet Lumina. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Volvo XC90 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Chevrolet Lumina (530 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 149 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Volvo XC90. (381 Nm @ 1800 RPM). This means 2009 Chevrolet Lumina will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Volvo XC90.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Chevrolet Lumina | 2005 Volvo XC90 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Volvo |
Model | Lumina | XC90 |
Year Released | 2009 | 2005 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5967 cc | 2922 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 362 HP | 268 HP |
Torque | 530 Nm | 381 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 1800 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1261 kg | 1438 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2920 mm | 2720 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 8 L/100km | 12.9 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 72 L |