2009 Chevrolet Malibu vs. 1960 Nissan Cedric
To start off, 2009 Chevrolet Malibu is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 2,399 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Chevrolet Malibu is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Chevrolet Malibu (170 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 110 more horse power than 1960 Nissan Cedric. (60 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet Malibu should accelerate faster than 1960 Nissan Cedric.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Chevrolet Malibu (217 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 101 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Nissan Cedric. (116 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2009 Chevrolet Malibu will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Chevrolet Malibu | 1960 Nissan Cedric | |
Make | Chevrolet | Nissan |
Model | Malibu | Cedric |
Year Released | 2009 | 1960 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2399 cc | 1488 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 170 HP | 60 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 217 Nm | 116 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 2540 mm |