2009 Chevrolet Malibu vs. 1962 DAF 600
To start off, 2009 Chevrolet Malibu is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 DAF 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 DAF 600 would be higher. At 2,399 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Chevrolet Malibu is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Chevrolet Malibu (170 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 151 more horse power than 1962 DAF 600. (19 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet Malibu should accelerate faster than 1962 DAF 600. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Chevrolet Malibu weights approximately 631 kg more than 1962 DAF 600. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Chevrolet Malibu (217 Nm) has 172 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 DAF 600. (45 Nm). This means 2009 Chevrolet Malibu will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 DAF 600.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Chevrolet Malibu | 1962 DAF 600 | |
Make | Chevrolet | DAF |
Model | Malibu | 600 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1962 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2399 cc | 590 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 170 HP | 19 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 217 Nm | 45 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1261 kg | 630 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 3620 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1450 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 2060 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 61 L | 28 L |