2009 Chevrolet Malibu vs. 1963 Nissan Bluebird
To start off, 2009 Chevrolet Malibu is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Nissan Bluebird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Nissan Bluebird would be higher. At 2,399 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Chevrolet Malibu is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Chevrolet Malibu (162 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 115 more horse power than 1963 Nissan Bluebird. (47 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet Malibu should accelerate faster than 1963 Nissan Bluebird. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Chevrolet Malibu weights approximately 1425 kg more than 1963 Nissan Bluebird. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Chevrolet Malibu (159 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 71 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Nissan Bluebird. (88 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2009 Chevrolet Malibu will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Nissan Bluebird.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Chevrolet Malibu | 1963 Nissan Bluebird | |
Make | Chevrolet | Nissan |
Model | Malibu | Bluebird |
Year Released | 2009 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2399 cc | 1189 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 162 HP | 47 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 159 Nm | 88 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 2385 kg | 960 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 4000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1500 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 2390 mm |