2009 Chevrolet Malibu vs. 1963 Suzuki Fronte
To start off, 2009 Chevrolet Malibu is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Suzuki Fronte. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Suzuki Fronte would be higher. At 2,399 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Chevrolet Malibu is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Chevrolet Malibu (162 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 144 more horse power than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. (18 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet Malibu should accelerate faster than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Chevrolet Malibu weights approximately 1885 kg more than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Chevrolet Malibu (159 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 127 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. (32 Nm @ 3700 RPM). This means 2009 Chevrolet Malibu will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Suzuki Fronte.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Chevrolet Malibu | 1963 Suzuki Fronte | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Suzuki |
| Model | Malibu | Fronte |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1963 |
| Engine Size | 2399 cc | 358 cc |
| Horse Power | 162 HP | 18 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 159 Nm | 32 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 3700 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 2385 kg | 500 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 3000 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1300 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1390 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 2060 mm |
