2009 Chevrolet Malibu vs. 1968 Nissan Cedric
To start off, 2009 Chevrolet Malibu is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 2,397 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Chevrolet Malibu is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Chevrolet Malibu (169 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 55 more horse power than 1968 Nissan Cedric. (114 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet Malibu should accelerate faster than 1968 Nissan Cedric. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Nissan Cedric weights approximately 29 kg more than 2009 Chevrolet Malibu.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Chevrolet Malibu (217 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 52 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Nissan Cedric. (165 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 2009 Chevrolet Malibu will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Chevrolet Malibu | 1968 Nissan Cedric | |
Make | Chevrolet | Nissan |
Model | Malibu | Cedric |
Year Released | 2009 | 1968 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2397 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 169 HP | 114 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 217 Nm | 165 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1261 kg | 1290 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 4700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 2700 mm |