2009 Chevrolet Malibu vs. 1968 Seat 600
To start off, 2009 Chevrolet Malibu is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Seat 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Seat 600 would be higher. At 2,399 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Chevrolet Malibu is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Chevrolet Malibu (170 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 146 more horse power than 1968 Seat 600. (24 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet Malibu should accelerate faster than 1968 Seat 600. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Chevrolet Malibu weights approximately 686 kg more than 1968 Seat 600. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1968 Seat 600 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Seat 600. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet Malibu, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Chevrolet Malibu | 1968 Seat 600 | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Seat |
| Model | Malibu | 600 |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1968 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 2399 cc | 767 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 170 HP | 24 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1261 kg | 575 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 3300 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1390 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1360 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 2010 mm |
