2009 Chevrolet Malibu vs. 1972 Mazda Cosmo
To start off, 2009 Chevrolet Malibu is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 2,399 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Chevrolet Malibu is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Chevrolet Malibu (170 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 77 more horse power than 1972 Mazda Cosmo. (93 HP @ 7000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet Malibu should accelerate faster than 1972 Mazda Cosmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Chevrolet Malibu weights approximately 319 kg more than 1972 Mazda Cosmo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Chevrolet Malibu (217 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 84 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Mazda Cosmo. (133 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2009 Chevrolet Malibu will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Mazda Cosmo.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Chevrolet Malibu | 1972 Mazda Cosmo | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mazda |
Model | Malibu | Cosmo |
Year Released | 2009 | 1972 |
Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2399 cc | 1964 cc |
Horse Power | 170 HP | 93 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 7000 RPM |
Torque | 217 Nm | 133 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1261 kg | 942 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 4150 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1600 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1170 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 2210 mm |