2009 Chevrolet Malibu vs. 1972 Rolls-Royce Corniche
To start off, 2009 Chevrolet Malibu is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Rolls-Royce Corniche. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Rolls-Royce Corniche would be higher. At 6,750 cc (8 cylinders), 1972 Rolls-Royce Corniche is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Chevrolet Malibu weights approximately 105 kg more than 1972 Rolls-Royce Corniche.
Because 1972 Rolls-Royce Corniche is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 Rolls-Royce Corniche. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet Malibu, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Chevrolet Malibu | 1972 Rolls-Royce Corniche | |
Make | Chevrolet | Rolls-Royce |
Model | Malibu | Corniche |
Year Released | 2009 | 1972 |
Body Type | Sedan | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2399 cc | 6750 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 162 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2385 kg | 2280 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 5210 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1500 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 3030 mm |