2009 Chevrolet Malibu vs. 1981 Skoda L
To start off, 2009 Chevrolet Malibu is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Skoda L. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Skoda L would be higher. At 2,397 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Chevrolet Malibu is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Chevrolet Malibu (169 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 125 more horse power than 1981 Skoda L. (44 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet Malibu should accelerate faster than 1981 Skoda L. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Chevrolet Malibu weights approximately 436 kg more than 1981 Skoda L. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Chevrolet Malibu (217 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 143 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Skoda L. (74 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2009 Chevrolet Malibu will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Skoda L.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Chevrolet Malibu | 1981 Skoda L | |
Make | Chevrolet | Skoda |
Model | Malibu | L |
Year Released | 2009 | 1981 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 2397 cc | 1044 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 169 HP | 44 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 217 Nm | 74 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.7:1 | 8.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1261 kg | 825 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 4170 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1600 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 2410 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 61 L | 38 L |