2009 Chevrolet Malibu vs. 1986 Fiat Ritmo
To start off, 2009 Chevrolet Malibu is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Fiat Ritmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Fiat Ritmo would be higher. At 2,399 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Chevrolet Malibu is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Chevrolet Malibu (162 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 79 more horse power than 1986 Fiat Ritmo. (83 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet Malibu should accelerate faster than 1986 Fiat Ritmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Chevrolet Malibu weights approximately 1465 kg more than 1986 Fiat Ritmo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Chevrolet Malibu (159 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 32 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Fiat Ritmo. (127 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2009 Chevrolet Malibu will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Fiat Ritmo.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Chevrolet Malibu | 1986 Fiat Ritmo | |
Make | Chevrolet | Fiat |
Model | Malibu | Ritmo |
Year Released | 2009 | 1986 |
Body Type | Sedan | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2399 cc | 1498 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 162 HP | 83 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 159 Nm | 127 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2385 kg | 920 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 4040 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 2460 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 61 L | 57 L |