2009 Chevrolet Malibu vs. 1996 Daewoo Arcadia
To start off, 2009 Chevrolet Malibu is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Daewoo Arcadia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Daewoo Arcadia would be higher. At 3,206 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Daewoo Arcadia is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Daewoo Arcadia (202 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 32 more horse power than 2009 Chevrolet Malibu. (170 HP @ 6400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Daewoo Arcadia should accelerate faster than 2009 Chevrolet Malibu. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Daewoo Arcadia weights approximately 329 kg more than 2009 Chevrolet Malibu. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2009 Chevrolet Malibu has automatic transmission and 1996 Daewoo Arcadia has manual transmission. 1996 Daewoo Arcadia will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Chevrolet Malibu will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Chevrolet Malibu | 1996 Daewoo Arcadia | |
Make | Chevrolet | Daewoo |
Model | Malibu | Arcadia |
Year Released | 2009 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2399 cc | 3206 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 170 HP | 202 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1261 kg | 1590 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 4960 mm |