2009 Chevrolet Malibu vs. 1996 Fiat Armadillo
To start off, 2009 Chevrolet Malibu is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Fiat Armadillo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Fiat Armadillo would be higher. At 2,399 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Chevrolet Malibu is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Chevrolet Malibu (170 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 64 more horse power than 1996 Fiat Armadillo. (106 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet Malibu should accelerate faster than 1996 Fiat Armadillo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Fiat Armadillo weights approximately 113 kg more than 2009 Chevrolet Malibu.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Chevrolet Malibu (217 Nm) has 17 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Fiat Armadillo. (200 Nm). This means 2009 Chevrolet Malibu will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Fiat Armadillo.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Chevrolet Malibu | 1996 Fiat Armadillo | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Fiat |
| Model | Malibu | Armadillo |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2399 cc | 1998 cc |
| Horse Power | 170 HP | 106 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 217 Nm | 200 Nm |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1261 kg | 1374 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 1850 mm |
