2009 Chevrolet Malibu vs. 1998 Peugeot Tulip
To start off, 2009 Chevrolet Malibu is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Peugeot Tulip. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Peugeot Tulip would be higher. At 2,399 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Chevrolet Malibu is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Chevrolet Malibu (167 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 78 more horse power than 1998 Peugeot Tulip. (89 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet Malibu should accelerate faster than 1998 Peugeot Tulip. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Chevrolet Malibu weights approximately 674 kg more than 1998 Peugeot Tulip. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Peugeot Tulip (205 Nm) has 45 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Chevrolet Malibu. (160 Nm). This means 1998 Peugeot Tulip will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Chevrolet Malibu.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Chevrolet Malibu | 1998 Peugeot Tulip | |
Make | Chevrolet | Peugeot |
Model | Malibu | Tulip |
Year Released | 2009 | 1998 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2399 cc | 1996 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | electric |
Horse Power | 167 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 160 Nm | 205 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1554 kg | 880 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 2390 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 61 L | 45 L |