2009 Chevrolet Matiz vs. 1962 DKW Munga
To start off, 2009 Chevrolet Matiz is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 DKW Munga would be higher. At 979 cc (3 cylinders), 1962 DKW Munga is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Chevrolet Matiz (51 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 8 more horse power than 1962 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet Matiz should accelerate faster than 1962 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 DKW Munga weights approximately 335 kg more than 2009 Chevrolet Matiz.
Because 1962 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Chevrolet Matiz. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1962 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Chevrolet Matiz | 1962 DKW Munga | |
Make | Chevrolet | DKW |
Model | Matiz | Munga |
Year Released | 2009 | 1962 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 794 cc | 979 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 51 HP | 43 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 68.5 mm | 76 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 72 mm | 68 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.3:1 | 8.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 775 kg | 1110 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3500 mm | 3450 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1500 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1760 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2010 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 35 L | 31 L |