2009 Chevrolet Matiz vs. 1968 Seat 1500
To start off, 2009 Chevrolet Matiz is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Seat 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Seat 1500 would be higher. At 1,481 cc (4 cylinders), 1968 Seat 1500 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Seat 1500 (71 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 5 more horse power than 2009 Chevrolet Matiz. (66 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1968 Seat 1500 should accelerate faster than 2009 Chevrolet Matiz. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Seat 1500 weights approximately 230 kg more than 2009 Chevrolet Matiz. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1968 Seat 1500 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Seat 1500. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet Matiz, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Chevrolet Matiz | 1968 Seat 1500 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Seat |
Model | Matiz | 1500 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1968 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 995 cc | 1481 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 66 HP | 71 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 930 kg | 1160 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3500 mm | 4470 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1500 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1480 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2660 mm |