2009 Chevrolet Matiz vs. 2001 Volvo SCC
To start off, 2009 Chevrolet Matiz is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Volvo SCC. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Volvo SCC would be higher. At 2,521 cc, 2001 Volvo SCC is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Volvo SCC (208 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 157 more horse power than 2009 Chevrolet Matiz. (51 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Volvo SCC should accelerate faster than 2009 Chevrolet Matiz. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Volvo SCC weights approximately 676 kg more than 2009 Chevrolet Matiz. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2001 Volvo SCC (285 Nm) has 214 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Chevrolet Matiz. (71 Nm). This means 2001 Volvo SCC will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Chevrolet Matiz. 2001 Volvo SCC has automatic transmission and 2009 Chevrolet Matiz has manual transmission. 2009 Chevrolet Matiz will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 Volvo SCC will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Chevrolet Matiz | 2001 Volvo SCC | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Volvo |
| Model | Matiz | SCC |
| Year Released | 2009 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 794 cc | 2521 cc |
| Horse Power | 51 HP | 208 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 71 Nm | 285 Nm |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 775 kg | 1451 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2720 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 35 L | 70 L |
