2009 Chevrolet Matiz vs. 2004 Chrysler Crossfire
To start off, 2009 Chevrolet Matiz is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Chrysler Crossfire. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Chrysler Crossfire would be higher. At 3,199 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chrysler Crossfire is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chrysler Crossfire (210 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 159 more horse power than 2009 Chevrolet Matiz. (51 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chrysler Crossfire should accelerate faster than 2009 Chevrolet Matiz. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chrysler Crossfire weights approximately 688 kg more than 2009 Chevrolet Matiz. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 Chrysler Crossfire is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Chrysler Crossfire. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet Matiz, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Chrysler Crossfire (310 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 239 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Chevrolet Matiz. (71 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 2004 Chrysler Crossfire will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Chevrolet Matiz.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Chevrolet Matiz | 2004 Chrysler Crossfire | |
Make | Chevrolet | Chrysler |
Model | Matiz | Crossfire |
Year Released | 2009 | 2004 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 794 cc | 3199 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 3 valves |
Horse Power | 51 HP | 210 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5700 RPM |
Torque | 71 Nm | 310 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 68.5 mm | 89.4 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 72 mm | 84 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.3:1 | 10.0:1 |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 18.2 seconds | 6.9 seconds |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 775 kg | 1463 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3500 mm | 4070 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1500 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1310 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2620 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 5.2 L/100km | 11.1 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 35 L | 60 L |