2009 Chevrolet Rezzo vs. 1963 Renault 4
To start off, 2009 Chevrolet Rezzo is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Renault 4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Renault 4 would be higher. At 1,597 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Chevrolet Rezzo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Chevrolet Rezzo (103 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 70 more horse power than 1963 Renault 4. (33 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet Rezzo should accelerate faster than 1963 Renault 4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Chevrolet Rezzo weights approximately 697 kg more than 1963 Renault 4. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Chevrolet Rezzo | 1963 Renault 4 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Renault |
Model | Rezzo | 4 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1597 cc | 747 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 103 HP | 33 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1347 kg | 650 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4360 mm | 3670 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1490 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 1560 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2410 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 38 L |