2009 Chevrolet Rezzo vs. 1978 Volvo 66
To start off, 2009 Chevrolet Rezzo is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Volvo 66. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Volvo 66 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Chevrolet Rezzo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Chevrolet Rezzo (119 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 63 more horse power than 1978 Volvo 66. (56 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet Rezzo should accelerate faster than 1978 Volvo 66.
Because 1978 Volvo 66 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1978 Volvo 66. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet Rezzo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Chevrolet Rezzo (176 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 82 more torque (in Nm) than 1978 Volvo 66. (94 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2009 Chevrolet Rezzo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1978 Volvo 66.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Chevrolet Rezzo | 1978 Volvo 66 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Volvo |
Model | Rezzo | 66 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1978 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1289 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 119 HP | 56 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 176 Nm | 94 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.6:1 | 8.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4360 mm | 3910 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1550 mm |