2009 Chevrolet Rezzo vs. 1982 Chrysler E
To start off, 2009 Chevrolet Rezzo is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Chrysler E. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Chrysler E would be higher. At 2,213 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Chrysler E is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Chrysler E (141 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 22 more horse power than 2009 Chevrolet Rezzo. (119 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1982 Chrysler E should accelerate faster than 2009 Chevrolet Rezzo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Chevrolet Rezzo weights approximately 136 kg more than 1982 Chrysler E.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Chrysler E (228 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 52 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Chevrolet Rezzo. (176 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1982 Chrysler E will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Chevrolet Rezzo.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Chevrolet Rezzo | 1982 Chrysler E | |
Make | Chevrolet | Chrysler |
Model | Rezzo | E |
Year Released | 2009 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 2213 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 119 HP | 141 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 176 Nm | 228 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1381 kg | 1245 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4360 mm | 4720 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2630 mm |