2009 Chevrolet Rezzo vs. 1992 Mazda 626
To start off, 2009 Chevrolet Rezzo is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Mazda 626. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Mazda 626 would be higher. At 1,840 cc (4 cylinders), 1992 Mazda 626 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Mazda 626 (106 HP) has 3 more horse power than 2009 Chevrolet Rezzo. (103 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1992 Mazda 626 should accelerate faster than 2009 Chevrolet Rezzo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Chevrolet Rezzo weights approximately 202 kg more than 1992 Mazda 626.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Mazda 626 (157 Nm) has 15 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Chevrolet Rezzo. (142 Nm). This means 1992 Mazda 626 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Chevrolet Rezzo.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Chevrolet Rezzo | 1992 Mazda 626 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mazda |
Model | Rezzo | 626 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1992 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1597 cc | 1840 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 103 HP | 106 HP |
Torque | 142 Nm | 157 Nm |
Top Speed | 167 km/hour | 185 km/hour |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1347 kg | 1145 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4360 mm | 4690 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2620 mm |