2009 Chevrolet Rezzo vs. 2005 Nissan Hardbody
To start off, 2009 Chevrolet Rezzo is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Nissan Hardbody. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Nissan Hardbody would be higher. At 2,389 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Nissan Hardbody is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Nissan Hardbody (138 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 19 more horse power than 2009 Chevrolet Rezzo. (119 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Nissan Hardbody should accelerate faster than 2009 Chevrolet Rezzo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Nissan Hardbody weights approximately 359 kg more than 2009 Chevrolet Rezzo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 Nissan Hardbody is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Chevrolet Rezzo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Nissan Hardbody will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Nissan Hardbody (208 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 32 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Chevrolet Rezzo. (176 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2005 Nissan Hardbody will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Chevrolet Rezzo.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Chevrolet Rezzo | 2005 Nissan Hardbody | |
Make | Chevrolet | Nissan |
Model | Rezzo | Hardbody |
Year Released | 2009 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 2389 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 119 HP | 138 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 176 Nm | 208 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.6:1 | 9.2:1 |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1381 kg | 1740 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2830 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 84 L |