2009 Chevrolet Rezzo vs. 2011 Toyota Matrix
To start off, 2011 Toyota Matrix is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 Chevrolet Rezzo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 Chevrolet Rezzo would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Chevrolet Rezzo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Toyota Matrix (132 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 13 more horse power than 2009 Chevrolet Rezzo. (119 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Toyota Matrix should accelerate faster than 2009 Chevrolet Rezzo.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Chevrolet Rezzo (176 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 3 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Toyota Matrix. (173 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 2009 Chevrolet Rezzo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Toyota Matrix.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Chevrolet Rezzo | 2011 Toyota Matrix | |
Make | Chevrolet | Toyota |
Model | Rezzo | Matrix |
Year Released | 2009 | 2011 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1800 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 119 HP | 132 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 176 Nm | 173 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4360 mm | 4366 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1765 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 1549 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2601 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 50 L |