2009 Chevrolet Rezzo vs. 2012 Toyota Matrix
To start off, 2012 Toyota Matrix is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 Chevrolet Rezzo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 Chevrolet Rezzo would be higher. At 1,800 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Toyota Matrix is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Toyota Matrix (132 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 29 more horse power than 2009 Chevrolet Rezzo. (103 HP @ 6300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Toyota Matrix should accelerate faster than 2009 Chevrolet Rezzo.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Toyota Matrix (173 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 31 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Chevrolet Rezzo. (142 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 2012 Toyota Matrix will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Chevrolet Rezzo.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Chevrolet Rezzo | 2012 Toyota Matrix | |
Make | Chevrolet | Toyota |
Model | Rezzo | Matrix |
Year Released | 2009 | 2012 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1597 cc | 1800 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 103 HP | 132 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 142 Nm | 173 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4360 mm | 4366 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1765 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 1549 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2601 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 50 L |