2009 Chevrolet Silverado vs. 2013 Smart Fortwo
To start off, 2013 Smart Fortwo is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 Chevrolet Silverado. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 Chevrolet Silverado would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Chevrolet Silverado weights approximately 729 kg more than 2013 Smart Fortwo.
Because 2009 Chevrolet Silverado is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2013 Smart Fortwo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet Silverado will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Chevrolet Silverado (458 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 366 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Smart Fortwo. (92 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2009 Chevrolet Silverado will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Smart Fortwo.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Chevrolet Silverado | 2013 Smart Fortwo | |
Make | Chevrolet | Smart |
Model | Silverado | Fortwo |
Year Released | 2009 | 2013 |
Body Type | Pickup | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 315 HP | 0 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Torque | 458 Nm | 92 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 5-speed automatic |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1549 kg | 820 kg |
Vehicle Length | 6340 mm | 2695 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1559 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1880 mm | 1542 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 4010 mm | 1867 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 12.4 L/100km | 4.7 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 16.8 L/100km | 5.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 129 L | 33 L |