2009 Chevrolet Spark vs. 1994 Mitsubishi FTO
To start off, 2009 Chevrolet Spark is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Mitsubishi FTO. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Mitsubishi FTO would be higher. At 1,996 cc (6 cylinders), 1994 Mitsubishi FTO is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1994 Mitsubishi FTO (197 HP @ 7500 RPM) has 132 more horse power than 2009 Chevrolet Spark. (65 HP @ 5400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1994 Mitsubishi FTO should accelerate faster than 2009 Chevrolet Spark.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Chevrolet Spark | 1994 Mitsubishi FTO | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mitsubishi |
Model | Spark | FTO |
Year Released | 2009 | 1994 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 995 cc | 1996 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 65 HP | 197 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 7500 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 10.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 15.4 seconds | 6.5 seconds |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3500 mm | 4370 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1500 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1310 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2510 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 7.3 L/100km | 10 L/100km |