2009 Chevrolet Spark vs. 2008 Mazda 3
To start off, 2009 Chevrolet Spark is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2008 Mazda 3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2008 Mazda 3 would be higher. At 2,261 cc, 2008 Mazda 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Mazda 3 (257 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 192 more horse power than 2009 Chevrolet Spark. (65 HP @ 5400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 2009 Chevrolet Spark.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Mazda 3 (380 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 293 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Chevrolet Spark. (87 Nm @ 4200 RPM). This means 2008 Mazda 3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Chevrolet Spark.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Chevrolet Spark | 2008 Mazda 3 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mazda |
Model | Spark | 3 |
Year Released | 2009 | 2008 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 995 cc | 2261 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 65 HP | 257 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 87 Nm | 380 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4200 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Top Speed | 149 km/hour | 250 km/hour |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 15.4 seconds | 6.1 seconds |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3500 mm | 4680 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1500 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2650 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 35 L | 55 L |