2009 Chevrolet Suburban vs. 1956 Toyota Master RR
To start off, 2009 Chevrolet Suburban is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Toyota Master RR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Toyota Master RR would be higher. At 5,300 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Chevrolet Suburban is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Chevrolet Suburban (310 HP) has 270 more horse power than 1956 Toyota Master RR. (40 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet Suburban should accelerate faster than 1956 Toyota Master RR. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Chevrolet Suburban weights approximately 990 kg more than 1956 Toyota Master RR. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Chevrolet Suburban | 1956 Toyota Master RR | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Toyota |
| Model | Suburban | Master RR |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1956 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5300 cc | 1453 cc |
| Horse Power | 310 HP | 40 HP |
| Vehicle Weight | 2200 kg | 1210 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5660 mm | 4280 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1680 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1960 mm | 1560 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2540 mm |
