2009 Chevrolet Suburban vs. 1962 Studebaker Sky Hawk
To start off, 2009 Chevrolet Suburban is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Studebaker Sky Hawk. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Studebaker Sky Hawk would be higher. At 5,298 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Chevrolet Suburban is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2009 Chevrolet Suburban is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 Studebaker Sky Hawk. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet Suburban will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Chevrolet Suburban | 1962 Studebaker Sky Hawk | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Studebaker |
| Model | Suburban | Sky Hawk |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1962 |
| Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5298 cc | 2779 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 310 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 5660 mm | 5150 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1820 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1960 mm | 1530 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2980 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 117 L | 68 L |
