2009 Chevrolet Suburban vs. 1963 Lincoln Continental
To start off, 2009 Chevrolet Suburban is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Lincoln Continental. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Lincoln Continental would be higher. At 7,048 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Lincoln Continental is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Chevrolet Suburban (310 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 26 more horse power than 1963 Lincoln Continental. (284 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet Suburban should accelerate faster than 1963 Lincoln Continental. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Lincoln Continental weights approximately 200 kg more than 2009 Chevrolet Suburban.
Because 2009 Chevrolet Suburban is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Lincoln Continental. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet Suburban will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Chevrolet Suburban | 1963 Lincoln Continental | |
Make | Chevrolet | Lincoln |
Model | Suburban | Continental |
Year Released | 2009 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5300 cc | 7048 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 310 HP | 284 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2200 kg | 2400 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5660 mm | 5500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 2000 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 3210 mm |