2009 Chevrolet Suburban vs. 1963 Mazda R 360
To start off, 2009 Chevrolet Suburban is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Mazda R 360. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Mazda R 360 would be higher. At 5,298 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Chevrolet Suburban is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Chevrolet Suburban (310 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 294 more horse power than 1963 Mazda R 360. (16 HP @ 5300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet Suburban should accelerate faster than 1963 Mazda R 360.
Because 2009 Chevrolet Suburban is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Mazda R 360. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet Suburban will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Chevrolet Suburban (454 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 431 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Mazda R 360. (23 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2009 Chevrolet Suburban will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Mazda R 360.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Chevrolet Suburban | 1963 Mazda R 360 | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Mazda |
| Model | Suburban | R 360 |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1963 |
| Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
| Engine Size | 5298 cc | 356 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 310 HP | 16 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5300 RPM |
| Torque | 454 Nm | 23 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 8 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 5660 mm | 2990 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1300 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1960 mm | 1300 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 1770 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 117 L | 55 L |
