2009 Chevrolet Suburban vs. 1965 Seat 600
To start off, 2009 Chevrolet Suburban is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Seat 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Seat 600 would be higher. At 5,300 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Chevrolet Suburban is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Chevrolet Suburban (454 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 407 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Seat 600. (47 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2009 Chevrolet Suburban will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Seat 600.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Chevrolet Suburban | 1965 Seat 600 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Seat |
Model | Suburban | 600 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1965 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 5300 cc | 767 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 310 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 454 Nm | 47 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 5660 mm | 3300 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1390 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1960 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2010 mm |