2009 Chevrolet Suburban vs. 1967 Ford Fairlane
To start off, 2009 Chevrolet Suburban is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Ford Fairlane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Ford Fairlane would be higher. At 5,298 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Chevrolet Suburban is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Chevrolet Suburban (310 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 169 more horse power than 1967 Ford Fairlane. (141 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet Suburban should accelerate faster than 1967 Ford Fairlane.
Because 2009 Chevrolet Suburban is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1967 Ford Fairlane. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet Suburban will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Chevrolet Suburban | 1967 Ford Fairlane | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Ford |
| Model | Suburban | Fairlane |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1967 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5298 cc | 4942 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 310 HP | 141 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Vehicle Length | 5660 mm | 5110 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2960 mm |
