2009 Chevrolet Suburban vs. 1974 Mazda RX-2
To start off, 2009 Chevrolet Suburban is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Mazda RX-2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Mazda RX-2 would be higher. At 5,300 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Chevrolet Suburban is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Chevrolet Suburban (310 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 191 more horse power than 1974 Mazda RX-2. (119 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet Suburban should accelerate faster than 1974 Mazda RX-2.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Chevrolet Suburban (454 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 297 more torque (in Nm) than 1974 Mazda RX-2. (157 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2009 Chevrolet Suburban will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1974 Mazda RX-2.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Chevrolet Suburban | 1974 Mazda RX-2 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mazda |
Model | Suburban | RX-2 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1974 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5300 cc | 2292 cc |
Engine Type | V | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 310 HP | 119 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 454 Nm | 157 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 5660 mm | 4160 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1590 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1960 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2480 mm |