2009 Chevrolet Suburban vs. 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 2009 Chevrolet Suburban is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 5,298 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Chevrolet Suburban is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2009 Chevrolet Suburban is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet Suburban will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Chevrolet Suburban | 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
Make | Chevrolet | Oldsmobile |
Model | Suburban | Cutlass |
Year Released | 2009 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5298 cc | 2260 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 310 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Number of Seats | 8 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 5660 mm | 4850 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1780 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2680 mm |