2009 Chevrolet Suburban vs. 1983 Zastava 102
To start off, 2009 Chevrolet Suburban is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Zastava 102. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Zastava 102 would be higher. At 5,298 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Chevrolet Suburban is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Chevrolet Suburban (310 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 261 more horse power than 1983 Zastava 102. (49 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet Suburban should accelerate faster than 1983 Zastava 102.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Chevrolet Suburban (454 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 359 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Zastava 102. (95 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2009 Chevrolet Suburban will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Zastava 102.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Chevrolet Suburban | 1983 Zastava 102 | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Zastava |
| Model | Suburban | 102 |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1983 |
| Engine Size | 5298 cc | 1299 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 310 HP | 49 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 454 Nm | 95 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Vehicle Length | 5660 mm | 3500 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1960 mm | 1340 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2160 mm |
