2009 Chevrolet Suburban vs. 2000 Ford TS-50
To start off, 2009 Chevrolet Suburban is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Ford TS-50. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Ford TS-50 would be higher. At 5,300 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Chevrolet Suburban is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Chevrolet Suburban (310 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 182 more horse power than 2000 Ford TS-50. (128 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet Suburban should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford TS-50.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Chevrolet Suburban (454 Nm) has 279 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Ford TS-50. (175 Nm). This means 2009 Chevrolet Suburban will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Ford TS-50.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Chevrolet Suburban | 2000 Ford TS-50 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Ford |
Model | Suburban | TS-50 |
Year Released | 2009 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5300 cc | 1989 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 310 HP | 128 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 454 Nm | 175 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2760 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 117 L | 132 L |