2009 Chevrolet Suburban vs. 2002 Toyota FCHV 5
To start off, 2009 Chevrolet Suburban is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Toyota FCHV 5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Toyota FCHV 5 would be higher. At 5,298 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Chevrolet Suburban is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Chevrolet Suburban (310 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 120 more horse power than 2002 Toyota FCHV 5. (190 HP @ 5300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet Suburban should accelerate faster than 2002 Toyota FCHV 5.
Because 2009 Chevrolet Suburban is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 Toyota FCHV 5. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet Suburban will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Chevrolet Suburban (454 Nm) has 101 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Toyota FCHV 5. (353 Nm). This means 2009 Chevrolet Suburban will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Toyota FCHV 5.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Chevrolet Suburban | 2002 Toyota FCHV 5 | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Toyota |
| Model | Suburban | FCHV 5 |
| Year Released | 2009 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5298 cc | 2981 cc |
| Horse Power | 310 HP | 190 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5300 RPM |
| Torque | 454 Nm | 353 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 8 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 5660 mm | 2720 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2860 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 117 L | 60 L |
