2009 Chevrolet Suburban vs. 2013 Toyota Tundra

To start off, 2013 Toyota Tundra is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 Chevrolet Suburban. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 Chevrolet Suburban would be higher. At 5,700 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Toyota Tundra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Toyota Tundra (376 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 66 more horse power than 2009 Chevrolet Suburban. (310 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Toyota Tundra should accelerate faster than 2009 Chevrolet Suburban.

Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Toyota Tundra (544 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 90 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Chevrolet Suburban. (454 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 2013 Toyota Tundra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Chevrolet Suburban.

Compare all specifications:

2009 Chevrolet Suburban 2013 Toyota Tundra
Make Chevrolet Toyota
Model Suburban Tundra
Year Released 2009 2013
Body Type SUV Pickup
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 5298 cc 5700 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type V V
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 310 HP 376 HP
Engine RPM 5200 RPM 5600 RPM
Torque 454 Nm 544 Nm
Torque RPM 4400 RPM 3600 RPM
Drive Type 4WD 4WD
Transmission Type Automatic 6-speed automatic
Number of Seats 8 seats 6 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Length 5660 mm 6290 mm
Vehicle Width 2020 mm 2030 mm
Vehicle Height 1960 mm 1925 mm
Wheelbase Size 3310 mm 4180 mm
Fuel Consumption Highway 15.7 L/100km 11 L/100km
Fuel Consumption City 23.5 L/100km 15.8 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 117 L 100 L