2009 Chevrolet Tahoe vs. 1964 Sunbeam Imp
To start off, 2009 Chevrolet Tahoe is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Sunbeam Imp. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Sunbeam Imp would be higher. At 5,300 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Chevrolet Tahoe is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Chevrolet Tahoe weights approximately 1453 kg more than 1964 Sunbeam Imp.
Because 2009 Chevrolet Tahoe is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1964 Sunbeam Imp. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet Tahoe will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2009 Chevrolet Tahoe has automatic transmission and 1964 Sunbeam Imp has manual transmission. 1964 Sunbeam Imp will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Chevrolet Tahoe will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Chevrolet Tahoe | 1964 Sunbeam Imp | |
Make | Chevrolet | Sunbeam |
Model | Tahoe | Imp |
Year Released | 2009 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 5300 cc | 875 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 320 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 8 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2200 kg | 747 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5140 mm | 3540 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1540 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1960 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2090 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 98 L | 27 L |