2009 Chevrolet Tahoe vs. 1967 DAF Daffodil
To start off, 2009 Chevrolet Tahoe is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 DAF Daffodil. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 DAF Daffodil would be higher. At 5,328 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Chevrolet Tahoe is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Chevrolet Tahoe (284 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 258 more horse power than 1967 DAF Daffodil. (26 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet Tahoe should accelerate faster than 1967 DAF Daffodil. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Chevrolet Tahoe weights approximately 1759 kg more than 1967 DAF Daffodil. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2009 Chevrolet Tahoe is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1967 DAF Daffodil. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet Tahoe will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Chevrolet Tahoe | 1967 DAF Daffodil | |
Make | Chevrolet | DAF |
Model | Tahoe | Daffodil |
Year Released | 2009 | 1967 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5328 cc | 745 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 284 HP | 26 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2419 kg | 660 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5060 mm | 3620 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2070 mm | 1450 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1970 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2060 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 98 L | 33 L |